The first person who I observed is an Early Childhood
Special Ed teacher. All of her students in her class have autism. I observed how the children are taught and how they learn in her
classroom. After observing their extensive ABA and VB therapy, I sat down to
ask her questions. I wanted to know how she felt about home programs. I asked
her if she has ever gone to her student’s homes to observe. She said that they
used to do parent/teacher conferences at the child’s home. By doing this, it
would give her a better understanding of how the child’s home life was. She also
said that the parents would ask her for any suggestions that they could use at
their home to help their child feel more comfortable. The teacher
would create a picture schedule for the child
to use at home, just like they use at school. The parents greatly appreciated
this. However, the teacher said that all of that has changed. Due to privacy,
parent/teacher conferences are no longer held at the child’s home. There are so
many restrictions these days, that it is very hard to help the parents.
Teachers have to watch what they say, they can’t EVER babysit any of their
students, they can’t implement home programs and the list goes on and on. There
is this fine line set in place that they absolutely can NOT cross. In my
opinion, this line could be a good thing or bad thing. I think that teachers
should be able to help these parents out at their home settings. I don’t see
anything wrong with that. However, teachers should be paid for doing this. Home
programs, in addition to their schooling, would help these children
tremendously! Children with autism strive on structure and need this throughout
their entire day.
The
second person I talked to is the school’s social worker. She is a member of the IEP team and is a part of the assessment and placement process. I wanted to learn more
about her role in this process. The social worker is the person who takes down a family history during the
evaluation process. If the child has had behavioral problems or personal
struggles, then the social worker would be the case manager. The social worker makes observations during the meeting. A
lot of the information the social worker uses is from the parents. She gets as
much of the information she can from the parents first, then assesses the
child. She said that sometimes it is hard to assess the child’s behaviors because
they are scared or confused while at the assessment. She goes mostly off of what
the parents describe.
I asked the social worker how she felt about the length of
the assessment. She feels that it would be more beneficial for her to observe
the child in different settings. For instance, a school setting and a home
setting would give her clearer, more substantial results.
The last person I interviewed is a speech psychologist at
the school. She is also a member of the IEP team. I wanted to learn more about her role in the assessment and
placement process of the children. The
psychologist is the person who will give the child IQ tests and other
psychological surveys as part of the evaluation portion of IEP planning. If the
child has mental health challenges, then she would be the case manager. The
psychologist makes observations during the meeting about your child's
psychological state or concerns. If the child is having problems during the
school year that require counseling, she may be able to help.
After the child
is determined to be eligible for special education services, the IEP team must
develop an individual education plan to be implemented as soon as possible
after eligibility is determined. Using the results of the full individual
evaluation, the IEP team works together to identify the child's present level
of educational performance, the child's specific academic, and any related or
special services that the child needs in order to benefit from their education.
After the IEP is developed, the IEP team then determines placement—that is, the
environment in which the child's IEP can most readily be implemented.
I asked the
school psychologist how she felt about the length of the assessment and she
agreed with the social worker. They need longer and more thorough assessments
in order to place the child correctly. She also admitted that there have been
several children who passed through clinic that were misdiagnosed or placed in
the wrong school setting. After talking with the teacher about the child, the
child was then placed in the correct setting. This whole ordeal could have been
bi-passed if the assessment was longer and the child was placed correctly. It’s
not fair to the child, the teacher, or the parents to place their child in the school
setting that is not benefiting the child. .
All of these interviews and observations have helped with my
advocacy plan that I would like to set in place. They have confirmed how I felt
all along about home programs and the assessment process. I’m looking forward
to talking with the administrative staff and also families of these children to
gain more information.